🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your insights on expanding your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals participated in an organized professional network test recently following popular discussions indicated that switching their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."